FORCED TO SHUT DOWN WHEN VIRUSES LEAKED AUGUST 2019
US SOLDIERS WERE INFECTED
300 HUNDRED CAME TO WUHAN ON PRETENSE OF TAKING PART IN THE WORLD MILITARY COMPETITION - WON NOT ONE MEDAL
SPREAD OUT IN WUHAN WITH SOME VISITING THE WET MARKETS
US CONSULATE IN WUHAN FULLY EVACUATED WITH BIOWEAPON DRUMS LEFT IN GROUNDS
https://youtu.be/WqYytIqk-WQ
WEEKS LATER FIRST VICTIM OF CORONAVIRUS APPEARED IN WUHAN
US FOUND TO HAVE 5 STRAINS, WUHAN HAS ONE
PROVING THE UNITED STATES IS THE ORIGIN OF THE CORONAVIRUS
August
6, 2019, the US's main biological warfare lab at Fort Detrick was
issued a "ceast and desist" order because of violation of safety
standards and protocol, and leaks.
August
- September 2019, "statewide outbreak" of a mysterious respiratory
emerged in the US, causing severe respiratory diseases in a few hundred
people. This was blamed on vaping although people had been vaping for
more than a decade without such outbreaks. Officials were unable to find
any relation to a specific vaping device and addictive.
August
2019 - Jan 2020, the US CDC reported that the US is gearing up for one
of the worst flu seasons ever, with 12000 deaths. On 12 March 2020, the
CDC director admitted that some COVID-19 deaths were misdiagnosed as the
flu because COVID-19 were found when they did posthumous tests.
October
18 - 27, 2019, the 2019 Military World Games was held in Wuhan. The US
sent a contingent of 350 athletes. They did not win any medals. The
athletes toured Wuhan.
November
2019, the Chinese press reported that five athletes who had suffered
from infectious disease had been discharged from hospital.
November
2019, Wuhan locals were detected with COVID-19, with a spike of such
terms in local social media. This coincided with the post-incubation
period after the Military World Games.
December
1, 2019, the first confirmed case of COVID-19 was detected in Wuhan.
Subsequently more than 80000 people will be infected. Of the first 41
cases, 34% were not related to the wildlife market.
Daniel
Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University,
claimed that because there is an incubation time between infection and
symptoms surfacing, and the presence of infected people with no links to
wildlife market, the virus could not have originated from the wildlife
market. Kristian Andersen, an evolutionary biologist at the Scripps
Research Institute, agreed with the assessment.
Genotype
assay of COVID-19 revealed 5 variants/strains (group ABCDE) of the
virus. Most regions in the world have 1-2 COVID-19 variants including
Hubei (mainly group C), and UK (Group .
US is the only country with all 5 variants (Group ABCDE). In Virology
101, the region with the most variants is the origin of the disease.
25
Jan, 2020, Japanese couple went for a 10 days vacation in Hawaii. On
the second week they fell ill. On return to Japan they were tested and
confirmed to have COVID-19.
Italy
lab confirmed that the strain of COVID-19 is different from the one
circulating in China, and that the circulation of the virus is not so
recent, and had been spreading undetected for weeks.
China's
coronavirus expert Dr Zhong Nanshan, the discoverer of SARS, said that
although COVID-19 was detected in China, it doesn't necessary mean that
it originated from China.
As
of March 12, 2020, the US had only tested 10000 people, and COVID-19
was confirmed in 1600 of them. As a comparison South Korea tests 10000
people a day, but the disease rate trajectory is the same as the US.
This suggests that there is a great number of infected people in the US,
just that they were not tested.
As readers will recall from the earlier article (above), Japanese and Taiwanese epidemiologists and pharmacologists have determined that the new coronavirus almost certainly originated in the US since that country is the only one known to have all five types – from which all others must have descended. Wuhan in China has only one of those types, rendering it in analogy as a kind of “branch” which cannot exist by itself but must have grown from a “tree”.
The Taiwanese physician noted that in August of 2019 the US had a flurry of lung pneumonias or similar, which the Americans blamed on ‘vaping’ from e-cigarettes, but which, according to the scientist, the symptoms and conditions could not be explained by e-cigarettes. He said he wrote to the US officials telling them he suspected those deaths were likely due to the coronavirus. He claims his warnings were ignored.
Immediately prior to that, the CDC totally shut down the US Military’s main bio-lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, due to an absence of safeguards against pathogen leakages, issuing a complete “cease and desist” order to the military. It was immediately after this event that the ‘e-cigarette’ epidemic arose.
Screenshot from The New York Times August 08, 2019
We also had the Japanese citizens infected in September of 2019, in Hawaii, people who had never been to China, these infections occurring on US soil long before the outbreak in Wuhan but only shortly after the locking down of Fort Detrick.
Then, on Chinese social media, another article appeared, aware of the above but presenting further details. It stated in part that five “foreign” athletes or other personnel visiting Wuhan for the World Military Games (October 18-27, 2019) were hospitalised in Wuhan for an undetermined infection.
The article explains more clearly that the Wuhan version of the virus could have come only from the US because it is what they call a “branch” which could not have been created first because it would have no ‘seed’. It would have to have been a new variety spun off the original ‘trunk’, and that trunk exists only in the US. (1)
There has been much public speculation that the coronavirus had been deliberately transmitted to China but, according to the Chinese article, a less sinister alternative is possible.
If some members of the US team at the World Military Games (18-27 October) had become infected by the virus from an accidental outbreak at Fort Detrick it is possible that, with a long initial incubation period, their symptoms might have been minor, and those individuals could easily have ‘toured’ the city of Wuhan during their stay, infecting potentially thousands of local residents in various locations, many of whom would later travel to the seafood market from which the virus would spread like wildfire (as it did).
That would account also for the practical impossibility of locating the legendary “patient zero” – which in this case has never been found since there would have been many of them.
Next, Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease expert at Georgetown University in Washington, said in an article in Science magazine that the first human infection has been confirmed as occurring in November 2019, (not in Wuhan), suggesting the virus originated elsewhere and then spread to the seafood markets. “One group put the origin of the outbreak as early as 18 September 2019.” (2) (3)
China’s New Coronavirus: An Examination of the FactsWuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally.
Description of earliest cases suggests outbreak began elsewhere.
The article states:
“As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.” (4) (5)
The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases”, they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link”, says Daniel Lucey . . . (6)
Earlier reports from Chinese health authorities and the World Health Organization had said the first patient had onset of symptoms on 8 December 2019 – and those reports simply said “most” cases had links to the seafood market, which was closed on 1 January. (7)
“Lucey says if the new data are accurate, the first human infections must have occurred in November 2019 – if not earlier – because there is an incubation time between infection and symptoms surfacing. If so, the virus possibly spread silently between people in Wuhan – and perhaps elsewhere – before the cluster of cases from the city’s now-infamous Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was discovered in late December. “The virus came into that marketplace before it came out of that marketplace”, Lucey asserts.
“China must have realized the epidemic did not originate in that Wuhan Huanan seafood market”, Lucey told Science Insider. (8)
Kristian Andersen is an evolutionary biologist at the Scripps Research Institute who has analyzed sequences of 2019-nCoV to try to clarify its origin. He said the scenario was “entirely plausible” of infected persons bringing the virus into the seafood market from somewhere outside. According to the Science article,
“Andersen posted his analysis of 27 available genomes of 2019-nCoV on 25 January on a virology research website. It suggests they had a “most recent common ancestor” – meaning a common source – as early as 1 October 2019.” (9)
It was interesting that Lucey also noted that MERS was originally believed to have come from a patient in Saudi Arabia in June of 2012, but later and more thorough studies traced it back to an earlier hospital outbreak of unexplained pneumonia in Jordan in April of that year. Lucey said that from stored samples from people who died in Jordan, medical authorities confirmed they had been infected with the MERS virus. (10)
This would provide impetus for caution among the public in accepting the “official standard narrative” that the Western media are always so eager to provide – as they did with SARS, MERS, and ZIKA, all of which ‘official narratives’ were later proven to have been entirely wrong.
In this case, the Western media flooded their pages for months about the COVID-19 virus originating in the Wuhan seafood market, caused by people eating bats and wild animals. All of this has been proven wrong.
Not only did the virus not originate at the seafood market, it did not originate in Wuhan at all, and it has now been proven that it did not originate in China but was brought to China from another country. Part of the proof of this assertion is that the genome varieties of the virus in Iran and Italy have been sequenced and declared to have no part of the variety that infected China and must, by definition, have originated elsewhere.
It would seem the only possibility for origination is the US because only that country has the “tree trunk” of all the varieties. And it may therefore be true that the original source of the COVID-19 virus was the US military bio-warfare lab at Fort Detrick. This would not be a surprise, given that the CDC completely shut down Fort Detrick, but also because, as I related in an earlier article, between 2005 and 2012 the US had experienced 1,059 events where pathogens had been either stolen or escaped from American bio-labs during the prior ten years – an average of one every three days.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
By Larry RomanoffGlobal Research, March 11, 2020Region: USATheme: Intelligence, Science and Medicineprint 1291 125 23 1598
It would be useful to read this prior article for background:
China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US?
By Larry Romanoff, March 04, 2020
According to the latest reports from the Italian media, the "patient No. 1" in Italy has been found so far. The large-scale outbreak of the new crown in Italy is directly related to the trajectory of "Patient No. 1". Before the diagnosis, the patient had participated in many gathering sports events such as the 10,000-person marathon and football match, and dine with friends many times.
Within half a month, "patient No. 1" affected 50,000 people and 10 towns. It is worth noting that the Italian "patient No. 1" was infected with the new coronavirus after taking a vacation to Hawaii, USA, and had no history of Chinese residence. Therefore, from this perspective, the outbreak of the Italian epidemic has nothing to do with China.
Not only does the epidemic in Italy have nothing to do with China, other infected countries have no direct relationship with China. Researchers in the United States have reinvestigated people who died from the flu, and most have died of the new coronavirus. An elderly person infected with the new coronavirus has never contacted outsiders in rural Japan, and there are also cases in Spain and Iran. So the origin of the new coronavirus is not China! !!
Friends to help turn around, it is best to let unsuspecting foreigners also see that this is not a Chinese virus.
For the innocence of China, please forward, thank you
Italy quarantines millions in virus lockdown around Venice, Milan
A man wearing a protective mask passes by the Coliseum in Rome on March 7, 2020 amid fear of Covid-19 epidemic. — AFP
ROME: Millions of people were placed under forced quarantine in northern Italy early Sunday as the government approved drastic measures in an attempt to halt the spread of the deadly coronavirus that is sweeping the globe.
Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said on Twitter he had signed off on plans to strictly limit movement into and out of a large area including Venice and the financial capital Milan for nearly a month.
“#Coronavirus, the new decree is finally approved,“ Conte wrote, confirming reports published by Italy’s Corriere Della Sera newspaper and other media.
With more than 230 fatalities, Italy has recorded the most deaths from the Covid-19 disease of any country outside China.
The total number of people infected with the virus worldwide has passed 100,000 while 3,500 have died across 95 nations and territories.
According to Corriere Della Sera, without a “serious” reason that cannot be postponed people will not be allowed to enter or leave the entire Lombardy region around Milan – home to 10 million – as well as areas around and including Venice and the cities of Parma and Rimini.
Museums, nightclubs, gyms and casinos will be closed in these areas, the newspaper reported, adding that the measures would be in place until April 3. — AFP
Chinese police wear AI helmets to check pedestrians’ body temperature
Shenzhen, which shares a border with Hong Kong, police have also begun
to inspect drivers who come into the city with the help of the helmets.
The innovative equipment — named Smart Helmet N901 — is developed by
Shenzhen-based tech firm Kuang-Chi for curbing the epidemic. — Pix from
Daily Mail
https://youtu.be/U3YO9VMa9V4x
AMID the coronavirus crisis, police officers in China have started wearing AI-powered smart helmets which can automatically take pedestrians’ temperatures as they patrol the streets.
According to South China Morning Post (SCMP), the high-tech headgear has an infrared camera attached to it. It will scan the people within the radius of 5 metres which will light up and sound an alarm if anyone within the radius has a body temperature above 37.3°C.
The helmets are equipped with QR codes scanner and facial recognition features. It will display their personal information in a virtual screen inside when a police officer passes by a pedestrian. They are also furnished with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and 5G connectivity.
SinChew Daily reported that with the help of this helmet, two police officers were able to scan a total of 100 people on the streets in less than two minutes.
The imported COVID-19 cases have become the primary
source of new infection in China as they accounted for around one third
of the daily new cases on Friday, official data suggested Saturday
Posted by
rig
Malays
say they are falling behind other ethnic groups in many fields. They
seem to think that it is all because the non-Malays are in control of
the economy and the country. The solutions offered to them by their
political and religious leaders are the same; they were told that they
must unite and that they must follow the real teachings of their
religion. It is the same advice given to them all these years since
independence. It did not work out to help the Malays and the poor. How
much more unity can the Malays achieve, and how much more Islamic can
they be?
I wish to offer the Malays a new practical solution to their problems.
They need to abandon their political groupings where only Malays are
members of that group. They tried UMNO PAS and lately Bersatu; for sixty
years now, and what have they achieved? Very little. The Malays should
abandon the Malay only parties altogether. They are not only useless but
damaging to the welfare of the Malays.
For many years now, we are full of corruption and abuse of power; and
where religion has become a political tool. The purity and sanctity of
religion are compromised — the need for politics soils religious values
every day.
They must now join the grouping that they believe is a "threat "to them.
DAP is seen by many as a threat to the Malays, according to these
failed Malay leaders. If that is true, then the Malays should join the
DAP in droves.
You may say that DAP is a Chinese party, but that's because the Malays
refuse to join them. If we all join DAP then DAP becomes a multiracial
party where Malays will be fairly represented. It will cease to be a
Chinese party. It can be a dominant Malay party; not that it's
essential.
DAP is a party in government. Its a strong democratic party. Besides
PKR, this is the party that the Malays should join and try to get better
economic benefits for them by having a government with good policies
for the Rakyat.
Some questioned if the Chinese will share the fruits of the country's
economic development with the Malays. Of course, they will. They have
been sharing the wealth of the country with the Malays for three hundred
years now. Except that in the past; the wealth was shared with the
Malay elites.In Perak, the tin miners were partners with the
aristocracy. Since the NEP the Chinese were partners with the Malay
political leaders. I am sure you must know how many Malay political
leaders become wealthy because they have good Chinese and Indian
friends. I don't have to elaborate.
In this religious country; PAS leaders tell you that we must elect
Muslim leaders first. They conveniently do not follow what they preach.
You must know that the big timber tycoons and developers in the country
are mainly Chinese. PAS leaders, too, are close to wealthy Chinese
people in the business. So you see the Chinese do share their wealth
with the Malays.
What must change is that the ordinary Malays like you and me must get
together to create a new political force and become a genuine business
partner of the non Malays? Why should the Chinese deal with the
'middlemen' like they have done for hundreds of years when they can deal
directly with the "Rakyat" to make this country prosperous and to share
its prosperity?
The reason why our leaders, both political and religious, want to keep
the Malays and the non Malays apart is to make them"relevant' as power
brokers. After sixty years of independence, I urge you, the people of
this country, regardless of race, to take ownership of the country.
Enough of the leaders using the politics of race and religion to divide
the people; and enrich themselves.
When the Malays and the non-Malays have real political power and willing
to collaborate as one, we can devise policies and programs that will
benefit all Malaysians. We can do so directly; addressing the real needs
of the people. Only then can we give real development to the people;
without the need to continue with the services of the rent-seekers and
wealthy politicians and wealthy civil servants.
All the Malays need to change is to abandon their fear of the
non-Malays. After all the non-Malays have always been sharing their
wealth with the Malays; since the days of Yap Ah Loy, the Perak miners
and the estate owners. This time we just have to tweak the formula; Let
the non-Malays unite with the Malays. Political and economic benefits
will flow to the ordinary Rakyat instead of the elites of this country
when politics ceases to be about race and religion.
Relax Non-Malays, Sit
Back & Enjoy The Show! Don’T Over-React – Let Malays Have Their
‘Supremacy’ Day & See If They Like It: Watch Muhyiddin Sweat As Hadi
Demands ‘Hudud’, Najib & Zahid Insist On ‘Free Pardons’ & The
Rest Of The ‘Backdoor Gang’ Clamor & Fight For Posts & Gravy
Train
PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin will be in charge of all ministries and government departments until the appointment of Cabinet ministers, says the latest Federal Government gazette.
The gazette signed on Tuesday by the Chief Secretary to the Government Datuk Seri Mohd Zuki Ali, also stated that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, pursuant to Article 43 of the Federal Constitution, has appointed Muhyiddin as Prime Minister.
“This Order is deemed to have come into operation on March 1,2020, ” said the notice that was uploaded on the Attorney General’s Chambers website.
“It is notified that the Prime Minister, (Tan Sri) Muhyiddin (Yassin) shall be charged with the responsibility in respect of all departments of the Federal Government and the subjects for which the departments are responsible until the appointment of other ministers in the Cabinet.”
Muhyiddin, who was sworn in as Prime Minister on March 1, met chief secretaries from the Education and Foreign Ministries yesterday.
The newly minted Prime Minister posted pictures on Facebook of him meeting the duo in his office that featured empty shelves and empty tables, a sign of someone who has just moved in.
In the Facebook post, Muhyiddin said Education Ministry secretary-general Datuk Dr Mohd Gazali Abas briefed him on developments and suggestions to upgrade the education sector.
Foreign Ministry chief secretary Datuk Seri Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob was also seen explaining Malaysia’s current diplomatic relationships and pending international conferences.
“Mohd Gazali gave explanations on developments in the education sector as well as statistics of achievements, and gave suggestions on how to build up the education sector.
“Shahrul of the Foreign Affairs Ministry briefed the prime minister on the current relationship between Malaysia and other countries, as well as collaborations and important conferences which will take place this year, ” said the post.
It is believed that one of the main subjects discussed was the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) inter-governmental forum that will be held in November in Kuala Lumpur.
GPS, having played the kingmaker in the political saga, expects to be well rewarded. Thus, drawing up the Cabinet list will be a more complicated task this time around, as there are just so many variables that need to be considered.
AS Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin thinks about the composition of his Cabinet list, he will certainly need to take heed as to how Sarawak should be rewarded.
There is no doubt that the 18 Members of Parliament from Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) were the ones who made the critical difference in the numbers game last week.
The GPS consists of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP), Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) and Progressive Democratic Party (PDP).
It was game over when these lawmakers chose Muhyiddin instead of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to be prime minister.
Sarawak Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Openg put it aptly when he told the media that “now you know the value of GPS votes.”
He said the ruling state coalition initially supported Dr Mahathir to continue leading the country.
“After that, he resigned. Then he resigned from Bersatu. After that, he was back again. So left, right, left, right, what else to expect?
“That’s why we supported Muhyiddin. At the same time, our Sarawak interest is uppermost, ” he added.
And the rest, as they say, is history.
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had hoped that GPS would remain neutral at least but the political reality was that GPS had to make a stand.
If there was one big factor that had made up the final decision of the GPS, it has to be the DAP.
Outspoken Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri James Masing has consistently said that GPS would not support a coalition that included DAP in the ongoing political crisis.
He blamed DAP’s “administrative arrogance” for this, adding that the party did whatever it pleased without listening to others, citing Lim Guan Eng as an example.
He pointed out that the former Finance Minister had announced that Sarawak would go bankrupt within three years when the DAP leader came to the state last year.
The reality is actually the opposite.
In 2019, S&P Global Ratings has affirmed its ‘A-’ rating on Sarawak with stable earnings outlook and said the state’s exceptional budgetary performance and liquidity will likely mitigate its elevated debt, supporting its creditworthiness.
The state’s healthy financial standing and its stable socio-political environment have earned Sarawak commendable investment-grade credit ratings of A-, A3 and AAA by reputable international and domestic rating houses.
A Google search of the financial standing of the country’s largest state is sufficient to show that.
Lim’s hurtful remark, and other past disputes with the DAP, seem to have left a deep-rooted resentment of the party among GPS members, and last week, was payback time.
While it has been said that there are no permanent friends or foes in politics, this doesn’t seem to apply in the case of the GPS in this regard.
At one point, Masing even said the GPS was “more comfortable working with PAS than DAP.”
As the situation turned desperate, Sarawak DAP chief Chong Chieng Jen said the party was willing to make concessions with GPS to keep the Pakatan Harapan government intact, appealing to GPS “to put aside all past political differences and work together with Pakatan to save our country.”
Many interpreted the offer to mean the DAP’s readiness in not contesting in the upcoming Sarawak state elections.
But it came too late as the GPS had already made up its mind after having huddled together for two days at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Kuala Lumpur.
It remains to be seen what the GPS had asked for and what Muyhiddin has to offer.
It will be Sarawak’s gain over neighbouring Sabah as Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal opted to stay with Pakatan.
A statement from the Sarawak Chief Minister’s Office on Feb 29 said GPS supported Muhyiddin to restore political stability in the country without sacrificing Sarawak’s interest.
It also said that GPS would be friendly to the new Federal Government but was not a member of the Perikatan Nasional coalition.
Some senior leaders of the GPS said privately that they wanted to see what would be on the table but expected to be rewarded accordingly.
Others said that they were prepared to wait till the state elections were over – as these veteran politicians were aware that Pakatan would most certainly use the alliance with Perikatan Nasional as a rallying call against the GPS in the state polls.
Unlike Peninsular Malaysia, Sarawakian leaders are more interested in protecting and keeping their state positions rather than federal posts.
“The interest of Sarawak is more important than the interest of lawmakers, ” Masing told this writer.
But the immediate priority would be to demand a higher oil royalty from the current 5% and if this was a sticky point under Pakatan, it will likely remain so for the new Perikatan Nasional government.
The other is the Malaysia Agreement 1963, or more popularly known as MA63.
The agreement – an 18-point pact for Sarawak and 20-point for Sabah – was signed on July 9,1963, before the formation of Malaysia.
It is an important document safeguarding the rights and autonomy of the two states.
The 18-point and 20-point agreement covers religion, language, constitution, immigration, the position of the indigenous people, finance, tariffs and citizenship.
Sabahans and Sarawakians are understandably annoyed when they hear “orang Malaya” remark that these two states “joined Malaysia”, pointing out that they had, in fact, helped to form Malaysia.
In the peninsula, the governing state leaders are known as state executive councillors but over in Sabah and Sarawak, they are known as state ministers.
That also explains why Malaysians from the peninsula side need their identity card or passport when entering these two states, and state immigration have the right to deny anyone entry.
“Orang Semenanjung” who want to work in these two states have to apply for a work permit.
The same goes for lawyers who wish to appear in the courts of either state – they have to get approval beforehand.
Most Malaysians may not understand fully what MA63 is all about, even if they have become contentious political issues.
But most believe that the Federal Government has not given due recognition to the MA63 or that these safeguards have not been honoured or taken away.
Sarawakians want a greater degree of financial and political autonomy as compared to other states in the peninsula and not end up being merely one of the 13 states in Malaysia.
It remains to be seen how or what posts would be given to the GPS MPs, and whether this state coalition wishes to wait till the state polls are over before moving in but what is certain is that the new Prime Minister certainly cannot ignore the Land of the Hornbill.
Abang Jo’s words (now you know the value of the GPS) would surely ring continuously in the ears of the Prime Minister.
And now, this explains why a tiny country like Malaysia, with a population of over 32 million people, has a big Cabinet – it is simply because the Prime Minister has to accommodate so many geographical and ethnic interests.
It is also very possible that the Prime Minister may announce the appointments in batches, starting with the crucial ones.
This will allow him time to tinker.
Drawing up the Cabinet list will be a more complicated task this time, unlike previously, as there are just so many variables that need to be considered.
Exchanging views: Muhyiddin (from right) with Mufti Datuk Seri Dr
Zulkifli Mohamad Al-Bakri and Chief Secretary to the government Datuk
Seri Mohd Zuki Ali at Bangunan Perdana Putra. — Bernama
PETALING JAYA: With all eyes on who will make it into Prime Minister Tan
Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s Cabinet, the business sector and moderation
advocates are urging for quality over political loyalty.
Malay Businessmen and Industrialists Association of Malaysia (Perdasama) vice-president Datuk Sohaimi Shahadan said the new Cabinet line-up must include those with enough experience and expertise in their respective ministries.
“They should not be appointed based on political appointment or connection, networking, or to pay back any form of political assistance.
“The individual must be highly educated, experienced, and understands his job scope to strengthen the current government,” he said.
He proposed that the Cabinet should be a mix of old and new leaders from various backgrounds, as well as professionals who could be appointed as senators to become a Cabinet minister.
“We have experienced ministers from the previous government who did not carry any weight, could not perform their duties well and incapable of executing government objectives.
“A minister must be able to connect with those on the ground. For instance, we have many young business people who are doing everything online creatively. We want someone who is capable of connecting with them,” he said.
He urged the government to conduct a holistic review on the composition of the ministries as some could be merged or separated.
“Some ministries have too many agencies and departments under them while others have so few. The government should properly study and come up with a better structure,” he said.
Malaysian Associated Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (MAICCI) president Datuk N. Gobalakrishnan said ministerial positions should be given to those who are most qualified even if it means choosing an ordinary party member rather than a president or chairman.
“We would rather the posts be given not based on loyalty or who has the higher post in a party, instead to those who are most qualified even if they are just ordinary members,” he said.
The new government must also look into creating a more business-friendly environment for domestic direct investment (DDI), which has been sidelined in the previous administration’s focus to spur foreign direct investment (FDI), said Gobalakrishnan.
“There is a one-stop centre to give perks such as tax exemption and customs clearance under one roof to foreign investors, but there is no such facility for DDI.
“The government must focus on levelling the playing field for DDI so that the country stops losing local investments that are flowing outside as FDI to countries like Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia,” he said.
Gobalakrishnan also expressed hope for a special allocation of RM500mil yearly to aid Indian businesses in moving forward.
He said they were put in the same basket as non-bumiputra businesses which caused stiff competition and Indian businesses to be sidelined from securing funds.
“When we are placed in a non-bumiputra basket, fundamentally, or predominantly, other people tend to get the funds rather than Indian businesses,” he said.
Meanwhile, moderation advocates said the main focus for the Cabinet ministers, when appointed, should be to get the economy back on track and to promote unity among a divided nation.
Anas Zubedy said boosting a dampened economy and bolstering unity among Malaysians would be the two “key concern areas” for the new Cabinet.
“The ministers must be individuals who not only can reconcile people between the races but also who can bring the Malays back together,” he said.
He said the Cabinet should be a mix of experienced veterans and young blood, depending on their past records.
“The Umno ministers who did a good job in the past should be brought back. It is about getting things done,” he said, adding that it must not be someone who currently has a court case.
“We must take the best talent from everywhere and I believe this was the best option for our country when the idea of the unity government was proposed,” he said.
Mohamed Tawfik Ismail, the son of former deputy prime minister Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman, said education reforms and national unity would be some of the priority areas the new Cabinet must look at.
He said any potential minister must be financially independent and preferably be from a profession.
“This is so that this person will not only be less attracted to bribes but can resign on principle and go back to his or her profession,” he said.
He added that ministers must also be transparent in their family’s involvement in business. - The Star front page
.
US is the only country with all 5 variants (Group ABCDE). In Virology
101, the region with the most variants is the origin of the disease.
